Clifford Longley.


I love listening to radio 4 - unfortunately there are occasional bits of grit in my breakfast that have to be endured like "Thought for the Day" on the "Today" programme. This morning I had that awful sinking feeling as I listened to the contributor.

Clifford Longley is a journalist with a long career commenting on religious affairs so it is more with a sense of depression rather than any other emotion that I say what I am about to say. I barely know where to start in unravelling his confection of platitudes... any way here goes.

The notion that people make ethical decisions based on whether they believe they may be rewarded or punished and that atheists, having no such motive, can actually operate on a higher ethical plane leaves me speechless. This is such a childish notion.

The adult reality is that people make ethical decisions based on the worldview they hold to. If one is a thoughtful Christian one makes Christian decisions. An atheist will make choices consistent with that worldview. If it happens that one is an atheist who follows a none Social-Darwinian ethical process then one does so because one instinctively knows (by God's 'Common Grace'!) that such a course is right even if one finds oneself acting in a logically inconsistent manner. That is hardly operating on a higher plane.

The bishop CL was damning on air I suspect was actually pointing out that our values arise from the worldview we hold to be true. Reading between the lines of CL's garbled account the poor bishop was probably simply affirming a Christ centred worldview (which is his job afterall!) but that obviously went completely over CL's head.

A Christian may act unChristianly/Atheistically. An Atheist may act unAtheistically/Christianly. It all depends on the operating worldview. But this is all beside the point because merit is not earned in God's eyes by what we do. That implies that correct ethical choices put us in God's good books but that is not how it works! We all foul up from time to time - so the adult issue is how now do we get right with God given the reality of our failure? As a Christian I believe in Jesus not in my capacity to make correct ethical choices. A Christian, by definition, is someone who has come to a point of repentance rather than the media caricature of someone who is self-righteous, ie someone who believes that they always make correct choices!

As a Christian I seek to make ethical and personal choices consistent with the world as it actually is; though in my weakness I often feel brow-beaten by media pundits pushing the official line and find myself compromising against my better judgement. And when I do fail my primary concern is not fear of being punished it is the sense I have of not having 'walked worthily of Lord'. Others may make ethical choices on worldviews they are in a better place to explain. I seek to make choices which please the Lord, so reward/punishment are not the primary consideration! The ethical debate lies elsewhere entirely in the nature of reality and truth and relationship with God.

Clifford Longley's piece this morning is merely yet another example of the infantilisation of religious discussion in the country when it is crying out for informed comment and debate.